Who was the athlete (or coach) who most influenced your approach to further developing the SRM product? Who pushed you hardest to improve?
To be honest most athletes do not have the specific knowledge or experience to really make technical demands from the power meter. But there were some athletes who were particularly interested and demanding about equipment and the SRM. Greg Lemond for example was the first athlete who contacted me who wanted to use the SRM during a race. He used it during his return to racing at the Giro d’Italia in 1994 at team GAN. The other big innovator was Bjarne Riis. He was the first guy to win a race with a power meter on his bike during the race. That was the Amstel Gold Race in 1997. He sent me the data, I was able to see the watts he was producing in the last hour when he was riding alone and understood the level needed. I started working with Bjarne in 1996 when he moved to Team Telekom and he told them he wanted to win the Tour de France. They said Bjarne you are living in the clouds. But he was not put off. He made an appointment with Fausto Pinarello, went to visit them to see what bikes Indurain had been using to win the tour the last five years, went to Mallorca with me, did aerodynamic tests… And then he won the TDF 1996. Athletes like Lemond and Riis didn’t necessarily change the way I designed my product but they made it public and made more well known the use of technology to improve training.
Has there been any other invention or innovation you were involved in that comes from a direct request of an athlete, coach or federation?
The German federation asked me to create an ergometer that allowed the rider during testing to keep a constant cadence. They wanted this to understand the cadence that allows you to put out optimal power. The results were interesting: for track sprinters cadence for optimal power was 160rpm, for triathletes 95. Another request was to measure oval chainrings versus round chainrings and different crank lengths. But on these criteria we could not see significant differences.